The flip side of the Filipino Day

In News Reports, Society, Writing on April 16, 2014 at 2:34 am

We all know that there are racists and xenophobes in Singapore, as there are in any society. The sane among us know not to add fuel to their fire. We do not encourage their sentiments – because we do not share them. Sometimes we ignore them because there is no way to change how they feel. And, of course, no one would acknowledge to being racist or xenophobic.

So when does racism and xenophobia become news?

I ask this because I was aghast to read the article, Filipino group gets online flak over event, published in The Straits Times today.

It said: Organisers of a plan to celebrate Philippine Independence Day here had to remove a Facebook post about the event, after it drew a storm of vitriol and protests from netizens.
The online response came as a shock, they said, though they still intend to proceed with the celebration on June 8 at Ngee Ann City’s Civic Plaza, pending approval of permits from the authorities.

A lot of things get “online flak’’, so when is “flak’’ so heavy that it deserves further magnification in The Straits Times? Well, it seems that the removal of a FB post about the event by the hapless organisers was enough to merit a piece of real estate in ST. It was prime estate as well, on page A8, not in the bowels of its Home section.

Note: The organisers weren’t compelled to stop the June event. They are still proceeding with it as soon as they get the licences. If they were bullied into stopping altogether, methinks it would be worth some newsprint space.
So perhaps the online flak itself is enough to merit a story?

The article continued:
The Pilipino Independence Day Council Singapore (PIDCS), a group of Filipino volunteers, put up a post on Facebook about the event last weekend and drew fire almost immediately.
Negative comments from Singaporeans flooded in, with Facebook page “Say ‘No’ to an overpopulated Singapore” urging locals to protest on the PIDCS page.

The page, which has 26,000 “likes”, is against the celebration of the Philippine Independence Day here and said that festivities should be confined to the Philippine Embassy compound.

It was the 26,000 “likes’’ that prompted me to check the particular page. I couldn’t believe that 26,000 would say no to the community holding an event here. We have that many xenophobes? If so, it is something worth reporting because there is something seriously wrong with Singapore society.
It turned out that the FB page has been set up way back when the White Paper on Population was still a hot issue. The page has all sorts of posts, including on the death of a wrestling star, the haze and the predictable pillorying of G leaders. It wasn’t a page that was dedicated to the event.

The post which called for the protest drew 300-plus likes – a more “respectable’’ number. In fact, it is a number which should not even bother any journalist. It is inconsequential in the scheme of “likes’’ in the internet space. So why does it even deserve newsprint space in the august ST?

Now, I am firmly against the protest. I think the arguments against the Filipinos holding its own day at Ngee Ann City in Orchard Road are narrow-minded.

The protesters said on the FB page that they are against three things:
a. We are against them using the Singapore skyline in their logo for their Philippine Independence Day logo & posters, Facebook page, websites, etc.

Why? They live and work here presumably, and we are the host country. Perhaps some people think it looks as though the Filipinos have taken over the country? And Singapore is the Philippines? Why such insecurity? I happen to think it’s a nice gesture to the host country. It should be the Filipinos back home who are aghast that their own national symbols aren’t used. Not us.

b. We are against them in using the terms “Two Nations” and “Inter-dependence” in their Philippine Independence Day celebration posters. Singapore only observe and celebrate our own National Day on the 9th of August and we DO NOT and WILL NOT have a joint-celebration of “Inter-dependence” with another sovereign state. Their event is insinuating a very serious and misleading assumption; which we Singaporeans have never endorsed.

Hmm….is there a communication problem here? Something lost in translation? Isn’t it good that the community recognises the inter-dependence of nations? I don’t think the Filipinos are calling for a joint celebration! Rather, more an invitation to Singaporeans to join them in their celebrations.

Its organiser was reported as saying in ST: “We are not saying that we are trying to take over. Our drive is to be part of the community and try to open up to other nationalities. Interdependence doesn’t mean Singaporeans depend on us, but that we all help each other.”

I agree. It seems to me that the protesters have misled themselves

c. We are against them in celebrating their country’s Independence on Singapore soil. We urge them, however, to do so in their own Embassy compound.

For crying out loud…By the way, the community has held similar celebrations in the past, in Hong Lim Park and Suntec City. Is Orchard Road so sacred? And what does it say about the country’s own celebration of Singapore Day around the world; we took a public garden in Sydney and more recently, spent $4m or so in London. So Singapore should stop its own celebrations on foreign soil and confine the activities only in the embassy compound? If the other countries reacted like these “protesters’’ did, then perhaps we should.

The so-called protest leaves a bad taste in the mouth. But then again, it’s a SMALL group, not some 26,000 or so as ST seemed to have implied.

Which brings me back to the question: What is the duty of care that MSM should exercise when publishing or broadcasting what goes on on the Internet? There will always be vitriol, even in pre-Internet days. But to have the MSM further magnify this (based on 300, not 26,000 likes) is downright bad reporting and bad judgment. If it was a question of numbers only – that is, so many thousands of people protesting – then it should take a look at the anti-STOMP petition and publish a story. The same rules must apply, even to itself.

What I cannot abide is how the article has given the impression to its much touted 1million readers or so that the entire Internet community is a bunch of rabid, raving xenophobes. I wouldn’t put it past some politician to refer to this as an example of the terrible nature of the community.

Now I certainly hope the authorities aren’t going to get cold feet and deny the licences to the organisers because of this and cite “security and law and order considerations ’’. I hope the Filipinos go ahead and organise the celebration. Just make sure you don’t riot or consume too much alcohol or litter or pee in the plaza.

This Singaporean wishes you a good Independence Day.

  1. Bertha,

    I think it should have been just fine to go ahead and have the event as planned at wherever the organizers deem fit. Who knows, maybe the other expat communities might follow suit. Have a ‘Independence Day’ celebration every month (is that even possible???) will be pretty darn cool me thinks.

    I do think ‘interdependence’ was a wrong choice of word. Not sure if the organizers were trying too hard to be cheeky but as far as I’m aware, ‘inter’ means ‘joint’ in some shape or form no? Don’t think we share the same independence/national day the last I checked.

    “We are not saying that we are trying to take over. Our drive is to be part of the community and try to open up to other nationalities. Interdependence doesn’t mean Singaporeans depend on us, but that we all help each other.”

    So explain why ‘inter’ + ‘dependence’ if the organizers had not intended to imply whatever their message seemed to imply? Apologies but that quote above is so inline with lame excuses or in layman terms, trying to smoke/snake rather than just come and say “sorry ah, wrong word – we change, paiseh”. Did the ST editor/journalist coach the ‘response’? We’ll never know perhaps but if they did, this would go to fuel that newish cyber law thingy maybe.

    Is not what one intends their message to be but rather how it is perceived. Playing with words and trying to wiggle out of it only makes it worst. If I was amused when I first saw the word ‘interdependence’, I am more likely disgusted now with that lame smokescreen (quoted) above.

  2. DRUMS. So where’s that Yakult?

  3. I think some people had over reacted on this issue. But look at the underling problem which started all this! The reason for this xenophobic reaction is due to that many had been replaced by Indians and Pinoys in the workplace. Many had lost their jobs and had to drive taxis or other service related jobs which could slash their pay to a third of their last pay.

    Foreigners grouping up to bully and push Singaporeans out of the work place is a very common scene now.

    However, on the foreigners side, many felt that they are being treated unfairly especially by employers. Many SMEs bosses are pretty exploitative, that is why SMEs always find it hard to get good workers as compare to MNCs in the past before the ‘foreign talents’ influx.

    Singaporeans are finding it harder and harder to get jobs of decent pay. They are totally losing the battle to the foreigners. I do not know the mentality behind why employers prefer to employ foreigners even with when a foreigner and Singapore had ask for the same pay, had a similar qualifications and work experience. Maybe employers find it earlier to control foreigners especially when they are on employment contracts.

    Both side had their grievances to air and the battle goes underground with a government whose only purpose is focus only on ‘growth’.

    For the last few years, things had got worst for the Singaporeans with more and more being squeeze out of the job market while stress of cost of living, overcrowding and a overly competitive environment got worst.

    Unless the underlining issue had been resolve, this will only get worst and not better!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: